calculatepaycheck.net
2026 · 105 sourced parameters · 33 states checked

Methodology

How every figure on this site is computed, from which document, checked when, tested how, and what the engine does not model. The tool below reproduces any parameter; the map and the log show the state of each state.

Reproduce this figure
Value in the engine
$16,100 / $32,200 / $24,150
Checked on
2026-08-31
Status
verified

If the document says something different from the value shown, tell us: the correction is published on the corrections page with the date and the cause.

The principle: compute, cite, date

Every number on this site is produced by a deterministic engine from constants that carry three things: the document they were read from, the URL of that document, and the date someone read it. There are 105 such constants across federal, withholding, deduction limits, 51 state rule sets, 3,672 local jurisdictions, labour rules and price indices, and the sources page lists all of them with a CSV export. Nothing is typed into a page by hand: a salary figure in a sentence is the engine's output for the inputs the sentence names, so that when a constant changes, every sentence that depends on it changes with it. The AI layer, where a page offers it, receives the computed figures and is prevented from producing any number of its own; that boundary is described below. And the site publishes what it does not model, on the calculator itself and on this page, because a calculator that is silent about its limits is asking to be trusted rather than checked.

The date matters as much as the document. Tax figures change every January, some mid-year, and the most common failure across the calculators compared on this site is not a wrong formula but a right formula fed last year's constants. Each page shows the figures it used and when they were checked; the changelog records every change to a constant with the reason; and the sidebar's data-status card is computed from the constants themselves, so it cannot be forgotten.

Federal income tax: the annual computation

The annual federal income tax that drives the «refund or owed» figure is computed as the Internal Revenue Code describes it: gross wages minus pre-tax deductions gives adjusted income; minus the standard deduction ($16,100 single, $32,200 joint, $24,150 head of household in 2026, from IRS Rev. Proc. 2025-32, § 3.14) or itemised deductions gives taxable income; the seven brackets for the filing status (IRS Rev. Proc. 2025-32, § 3.01, Tables 1-4) give the tax; credits reduce it. The brackets are stored with the cumulative tax at each threshold as printed in the Revenue Procedure, which lets the tests check the engine's bracket arithmetic against the IRS's own figures rather than against a formula. Additional standard deduction amounts for age and blindness, the $2,200 child tax credit and its refundable part, and the 2026 deductions from Public Law 119-21 for overtime premium (up to $12,500), tips (up to $25,000), seniors and car-loan interest are applied here, at the annual level, because that is where the law applies them.

Federal withholding: Publication 15-T, derived

Per-paycheck federal withholding follows the percentage method for automated payroll systems in Publication 15-T: annualise the period's taxable wages; add W-4 step 4(a) other income; subtract step 4(b) deductions; subtract the step 1 allowance ($12,900 joint, $8,600 otherwise, halved when box 2(c) is checked); look the result up in the table for the filing status (the standard table or the step 2 checkbox table); divide the tentative annual amount by the pay periods; subtract step 3 credits per period, not below zero; add step 4(c). A pre-2020 W-4 on file is computed by the older method with the allowance value the publication gives.

The tables themselves are marked «derived» rather than «verified», and the distinction is deliberate. Publication 15-T's tables are the brackets and standard deduction rearranged: the zero-rate band at the bottom of each table plus the step 1 allowance equals the standard deduction, and the bands above it are the brackets. This site builds the tables from the verified 2026 brackets and deduction by that rule (IRS Publication 15-T (2026), Section 1 — Percentage Method Tables for Automated Payroll Systems; Form W-4 (2026)), and the tests confirm the derived tables reproduce the published ones for the standard and checkbox cases. Saying «derived» tells the reader exactly how much to trust them: as much as the brackets and the rule, no more.

Supplemental wages — bonuses, commissions, severance, vacation payouts — are withheld at the flat 22% when paid separately (37% above $1,000,000 in the year) or by the aggregate method when combined with regular wages, exactly as Treas. Reg. § 31.3402(g)-1 allows the employer to choose; the bonus pages show both.

Social Security and Medicare

Social Security is 6.2% of FICA wages up to the $184,500 wage base (SSA, Contribution and Benefit Base 2026; IRS Topic no. 751); Medicare 1.45% with no cap; the Additional Medicare Tax 0.9% above $200,000 of year-to-date wages regardless of status, as employers must withhold it, with the statutory thresholds by status applied to the annual figure. FICA wages are gross minus Section 125 deductions and not minus retirement deferrals, which is the single most common configuration error in payroll and the first line the stub checker tests. Year-to-date wages entered in the calculator move the cap to the right paycheck. Self-employment tax on the self-employed page applies both halves to 92.35% of net earnings and deducts half from income, per IRC §§ 1401–1402 and 164(f).

The 51 states: rules, verification, publication

Each state has a rule set: the system (9 states with no wage tax, 13 with a flat rate, 29 with brackets), the brackets by status and the rule for joint filers (doubled, same, or a custom schedule), the standard deduction, the personal exemption and whether it is a deduction or a credit, whether the state has local wage taxes, and a public note. Each rule set carries the revenue department's document and the date it was read, and a verification status: «primary» when read from the state's own publication, «compiled» when taken from a secondary source and pending the primary. 40 of 51 are primary today.

The verification log below records, state by state, what was checked, against which document, and what came out. 21 match; 12 did not match the compiled figure and were corrected (Arizona, California, Georgia, Oregon, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Maryland, Ohio, South Carolina, Mississippi, Hawaii, Louisiana); 1 are waiting for the state to publish its 2026 figures; 1 could not be read automatically and are being read by hand. 37 of the entries record a rule the compiled source omitted — a credit given as a flat amount rather than a deduction, a joint schedule that does not double, a deduction that phases out — and those findings feed the engine's backlog. State withholding on each paycheck is the annual state tax divided by the pay periods, which reproduces the state's percentage-method tables for the standard case and differs from them where a state's tables build in a credit differently; the state page says so where it does.

ALAKAZARCACOCTDEDCFLGAHIIDILINIAKSKYLAMEMDMAMIMNMSMOMTNENVNHNJNMNYNCNDOHOKORPARISCSDTNTXUTVTVAWAWVWIWY
21 verified · 16 pending · 12 corrected · 1 blocked · 1 incomplete. Colour: green verified or corrected, amber compiled/incomplete/blocked, grey pending.

Local wage taxes

The local layer covers 3,672 jurisdictions in 7 states: every Pennsylvania municipality and school district from the DCED register (resident, non-resident and local services tax); Ohio municipalities and school districts with their credits; every Indiana county; every Maryland county with the non-resident rate; the Michigan cities with a tax; New York City's resident schedule; and 12 named cities elsewhere (Philadelphia, Louisville, Kansas City and others). Each applies the state's own rule for residents and non-residents. Cities whose charge could not be verified against a primary source — Yonkers, Birmingham, St. Louis, Kansas City, Denver, Wilmington, Newark, Charleston — are described on their pages with the source and are not applied by the engine, which is the honest treatment of a figure that has not been checked.

What is not modelled

State disability and paid family leave contributions (California, New York, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Hawaii, Washington, Massachusetts, Colorado, Oregon, Connecticut), which appear as separate lines on the stub. US territories. The alternative minimum tax. Itemised deductions beyond the amount entered. Credits other than the child tax credit and those entered on the W-4. The earned income credit at the paycheck level. Employer-side taxes outside the payroll calculator. State-specific supplemental rates where a state publishes one (the state line on a bonus uses the annual rule). Reciprocity agreements between states for cross-border commuters. Each of these is named on the calculator's «not covered» list where it matters, and the list shrinks as items are built and verified; nothing is added to the engine before its source is in the table.

How the engines are tested

The test suite checks the federal engine against the cumulative tax figures printed in the Revenue Procedure at every bracket threshold for every status; the withholding engine against the published Publication 15-T tables for the standard and checkbox cases and against worked examples from the publication; FICA against the cap and the Additional Medicare threshold; and the state engines against the examples each state publishes in its withholding guide where it publishes any. The paycheck engine is tested for the invariant that net equals gross minus every line to the cent after rounding, for the Social Security cap landing on the right paycheck given year-to-date wages, and for the supplemental methods. Tests run on every change; a change that alters a published figure without a changelog entry fails.

The data pipeline

Documents are read — the Revenue Procedure, the SSA notice, each state's withholding guide, each local register — and the figures are typed into constants with the document, URL and date beside them. Tests run against the documents' own examples. The engine computes; the pages render the engine's output; the sitemap and the data-status card are generated from the same constants. Every page carries the figures it used and their dates. Readers report discrepancies through the form on each page; reports are checked against the source; corrections are published with the date and the cause. The changelog is the audit trail of the whole loop. The Paycheck Reality Index closes it from the other side: anonymous submissions of real stubs against the computed figure, aggregated by state and salary band and published once a cell has thirty of them, so that the site's accuracy is measured by its readers rather than asserted by its author.

How the federal withholding is computed

The percentage method of IRS Publication 15-T, applied to your figures: each box is one step of the form.

How the federal withholding is computed
Primary documents105 parameters
Constants with source and datecode
Deterministic enginecompute
Pages, API, widgetrender
Readersreports
Corrections and changelogpublic

The AI boundary

The «Explain my paycheck» button sends the computed figures — gross, each tax, the marginal and effective rates, the deduction used, the caveats — to a language model with instructions to explain them in plain English. It receives nothing you typed except those figures, and no identifying data. Its reply is checked before it is shown: any number in the reply that is not one of the figures it was given, or a rounding of one, causes the reply to be discarded. The model cannot compute, cannot look anything up, and cannot change a figure; it can only describe what the engine produced. Requests are cached by rounded profile, rate-limited by address, and capped per month; when the cap is reached the explanation pauses and every number on the page is unaffected. The model is a commodity provider chosen for cost; its identity does not matter because it is never a source.

How the federal withholding is computed

The percentage method of IRS Publication 15-T, applied to your figures: each box is one step of the form.

How the federal withholding is computed
Your inputsbrowser only
Computed figuresengine
Language modelexplain only
Number checkdiscard if new
Explanation showncached

Reproducing any figure

Pick a parameter in the tool above and it shows the value the engine uses, the document it was read from, the date and the status. For a whole paycheck, the API returns the same engine's output with the sources in the response, and the walkthrough on the withholding guide prints every intermediate number of the federal computation. $75,000 in California, biweekly, single, no deductions: gross $2,884.62, federal $295.00, Social Security $178.85, Medicare $41.83, state $106.71, net $2,262.23 — reproducible from Rev. Proc. 2025-32, Publication 15-T and the California Employment Development Department's 2026 guide.

Corrections and the changelog

Anything wrong is corrected in the data, not in the prose, so that every page that depended on the figure changes at once; the correction is listed on the corrections page with the date, the page, what was wrong, what the source says and who reported it (anonymously unless they ask otherwise). Changes to constants for any other reason — a new year, a mid-year law, a newly verified state — go to the changelog with the reason. Neither list is ever pruned. The site covers 1,533 pages from one engine, which is the only way a correction can reach all of them the same day.

Recent changes
  • 2026-09-15 · Deductions: Overtime, tips and senior deductions from Public Law 119-21 modelled as a settlement at filing, not as a withholding change.
  • 2026-09-15 · Site: calculatepaycheck.net published: calculator, 51 state pages, city pages, salary and conversion pages, 29 calculators, 23 guides, 9 comparisons.
  • 2026-09-02 · Withholding: Publication 15-T percentage-method tables derived from the 2026 brackets and standard deduction; marked «derived».
  • 2026-09-02 · New York City: NYC resident schedule loaded from the IT-201 instructions.
  • 2026-09-01 · States: First batch of state rules checked against each state revenue department; verification log opened.
  • 2026-09-01 · Local: Pennsylvania (DCED register), Ohio (municipal and school district tables), Indiana (county rates), Maryland (Withholding Tax Facts 2026) and Michigan city tables loaded.
  • 2026-09-01 · Arizona: The 2.5% flat rate was right; the standard deduction was not. Arizona has conformed to the FEDERAL standard deduction since 2019, so for 2026 it is $16,100 / $32,200. The compiled figure we held was roughly half that, overstating taxable income by about $7,750 and the bill by about $194. Corrected.
  • 2026-09-01 · California: The standard deduction did not match. The 2026 Form 540-ES says literally "$5,706 single or married/RDP filing separately" and "$11,412 married/RDP filing jointly, head of household"; we were serving 2025's figures. Note also that the FTB has not published 2026 brackets — its own form instructs filers to "figure your tax using the 2025 tax table", so the brackets we serve are 2025's, which is exactly what the state tells you to do. The page says so.
  • 2026-09-01 · Georgia: The rate was not 5.19%. HB 463 cut it to 4.99% effective 1 January 2026, per the Governor's own release. This is the clearest illustration of why compiled sources fail: the bill was signed in MAY 2026 and backdated, so any table published before that date says 5.19% and was correct when it was written. Georgia hits its 4.99% target three years ahead of the schedule set in HB 1015.
  • 2026-09-01 · Oregon: All four brackets match. The 2026 exemption credit is $260 and we had $256 — corrected. Oregon is permanently tied to the federal definition of taxable income, so federal changes pass straight through. The Multnomah County and Portland metro local taxes remain outside the engine.
  • 2026-09-01 · New Jersey: All seven single brackets match; one rate was wrong — the fourth is 5.525%, not 5.53%. The more important find was in the same document: New Jersey's joint and head-of-household table has EIGHT brackets, one more than the single table, including a 2.45% band between $50,000 and $70,000 that a single filer never sees. Now loaded, making New Jersey the first progressive state to drop our joint-bracket approximation warning. It also exempts filers below $10,000 ($20,000 joint) from withholding, a rule the engine does not yet model.
  • 2026-09-01 · Massachusetts: The 5.0% rate matches; the surtax threshold did not. For 2026 it is $1,107,750 and we had $1,083,150, which is 2025's. The Fair Share threshold is indexed to inflation every year, so it expires on its own and has to be re-read each January alongside the federal figures.
Full changelog →

Questions

Where do the figures come from?
From the primary documents: Rev. Proc. 2025-32 and Publication 15-T for federal figures, the SSA for the wage base, each state revenue department for state rules, each city or county for local taxes. The sources page lists all 105 parameters with document, URL and date.
How often are the figures checked?
Every January for the annual changes, when a law passes mid-year, and whenever a reader reports a discrepancy. Each page shows the date its figures were last checked.
Does the AI calculate anything?
No. It receives the computed figures and explains them; a reply containing a number it was not given is discarded.
What does «derived» mean on the withholding tables?
That the Publication 15-T tables are built from the verified brackets and standard deduction by the publication’s own rule, and tested against the published tables, rather than typed in from the publication.
Why are some states «compiled»?
Their rules were taken from a secondary source and have not yet been read in the state’s own publication. The verification log says which, and the state page says so.
How do I report an error?
Through the contact page or the «report a discrepancy» link on any calculator. Reports are checked against the source and answered on the corrections page.

Verification log, state by state

21 verified, 12 corrected, 1 incomplete, 1 blocked; 14 not yet reviewed. Each entry names the document read and what was found.

StateStatusDocumentCheckedFinding
AlabamaverifiedAlabama DOR, FAQ "What is Alabama's Individual Income Tax Rate?" and Withholding Tax Tables (01-2026)2026-09-01Matches: 2% on the first $500, 4% on the next $2,500, 5% on everything above $3,000. Alabama's brackets are so compressed that the top rate arrives at $3,000, so nearly every worker pays 5% on most of their income — it is the state where the marginal and effective rates sit closest together. Its joint brackets do double ($1,000 and $6,000), but we have not loaded that as verified yet.
AlaskapendingNot yet checked against the state's own publication.
ArizonacorrectedArizona DOR, Individual Income Tax Highlights and IRC conformity2026-09-01The 2.5% flat rate was right; the standard deduction was not. Arizona has conformed to the FEDERAL standard deduction since 2019, so for 2026 it is $16,100 / $32,200. The compiled figure we held was roughly half that, overstating taxable income by about $7,750 and the bill by about $194. Corrected.
ArkansasverifiedArkansas DFA, rate tables and 2026 Form AR1000ES2026-09-01Standard deduction of $2,470 confirmed, and both rates (2% and 3.90%) match. Arkansas gives its personal exemption as a $29 credit rather than a reduction in taxable income — the engine already treats it that way. The deduction is among the lowest in the country.
CaliforniacorrectedCalifornia FTB, 2026 Instructions for Form 540-ES2026-09-01The standard deduction did not match. The 2026 Form 540-ES says literally "$5,706 single or married/RDP filing separately" and "$11,412 married/RDP filing jointly, head of household"; we were serving 2025's figures. Note also that the FTB has not published 2026 brackets — its own form instructs filers to "figure your tax using the 2025 tax table", so the brackets we serve are 2025's, which is exactly what the state tells you to do. The page says so.
ColoradoverifiedColorado DOR, Individual Income Tax Guide (January 2026)2026-09-01Flat 4.40% on federal taxable income, confirmed in the current guide. Colorado is the only state whose rate can fall temporarily through a mechanism unrelated to the tax calendar: when TABOR requires a surplus refund, the rate drops for that year. There are also proposals for a permanent cut to 4.0% that are NOT in force. This one is worth reconfirming each fiscal year, not just each January.
ConnecticutverifiedCT DRS, IP 2026(1) Income Tax Withholding Requirements and the 2026 Form CT-W42026-09-01Seven brackets from 2.00% to 6.99% confirmed. Connecticut phases its personal exemption down to nothing at higher incomes, which the engine does not model — so we overstate the exemption for high earners. It also fully exempts pension and annuity income below $75,000 single or $100,000 joint, and 2026 completes the full exemption of IRA distributions.
DelawarependingNot yet checked against the state's own publication.
District of ColumbiaverifiedDC Office of Tax and Revenue, Tax Year 2026 Pertinent Data Book2026-09-012026 standard deduction: $16,100 single, $24,150 head of household, $32,200 joint — matching exactly what we hold. The District aligns its deduction with the federal one, so it moves whenever the IRS figure does. It is one of the few places where updating the federal number updates the local one too.
FloridapendingNot yet checked against the state's own publication.
GeorgiacorrectedOffice of the Governor of Georgia, press release of 11 May 2026 on HB 4632026-09-01The rate was not 5.19%. HB 463 cut it to 4.99% effective 1 January 2026, per the Governor's own release. This is the clearest illustration of why compiled sources fail: the bill was signed in MAY 2026 and backdated, so any table published before that date says 5.19% and was correct when it was written. Georgia hits its 4.99% target three years ahead of the schedule set in HB 1015.
HawaiicorrectedHawaii DOT, tax tables and rate schedules for years beginning after 31 Dec 2024, and the 2026 payroll update2026-09-01All twelve brackets match. The deduction did not: for 2026 it is $8,000 single, $16,000 joint and $12,000 head of household, and we had $4,400 / $8,800 — roughly half. Hawaii's 2024 tax cut raised the deduction in steps and the compiled source stayed anchored to the earlier figure, overstating by about $280 on an $85,000 salary. The $1,144 personal exemption was correct, and there is an additional one from age 65 that we do not apply.
IdahoverifiedIdaho State Tax Commission, Individual Income Tax Rate Schedule2026-09-01Flat 5.3% confirmed, cut from 5.69% on 1 January 2025. Idaho's standard deduction is set EQUAL to the federal one, which is exactly how it is loaded. Because it conforms, Idaho automatically inherits the One Big Beautiful Bill changes: the enhanced deduction for older filers and the deductions for tips, overtime and car loan interest.
IllinoisverifiedIllinois DOR, Booklet IL-700-T (2026) and bulletin FY 2026-152026-09-01Flat 4.95% and a $2,925 per-person exemption for the year beginning 1 January 2026, both confirmed. The personal exemption DISAPPEARS entirely if AGI exceeds $500,000 joint or $250,000 otherwise — a cliff the engine does not yet model.
IndianaverifiedIndiana DOR, Departmental Notice #1 and "Rates, Fees & Penalties"2026-09-01Flat 2.95% for 2026 and the $1,000 personal exemption both confirmed. The rate is stepping down by statute — 3.05% (2024), 3.00% (2025), 2.95% (2026), 2.90% from 2027 — so the update is a calendar item, not a surprise. Indiana also gives $1,500 per dependent, which the engine does not yet apply, and its county rates are revised in January AND October rather than annually.
IowaverifiedIowa DOR, "IDR Announces 2026 Individual Income Tax and Interest Rates" and the withholding formula effective 1 January 20262026-09-01Flat 3.8% for 2026 confirmed: Senate File 2442 completes this year and every income level pays the same rate. Iowa revised its 2026 withholding formula expressly to absorb the federal One Big Beautiful Bill changes, so its calculation depends on the federal one more than most. If the federal deduction moves, Iowa's withholding moves with it.
KansasblockedKansas DOR, 2026 Form K-40ES and withholding guide KW-1002026-09-01Blocked, not wrong. The ksrevenue.gov server refuses connection from here — it times out, as it did in the initial sweep of all 51 state domains. This needs opening in an ordinary browser and transcribing by hand. The figures we serve (5.20% and 5.58% above $23,000, $3,605 deduction, $9,160 exemption) remain unchecked, and the page says so.
KentuckyverifiedKentucky DOR, "Kentucky DOR Announces 2026 Standard Deduction" and withholding formula 42A003 (10-2025)2026-09-01Flat 3.5% and the $3,360 standard deduction for 2026 both confirmed. The deduction rose $90 from 2025 through indexing — a figure that changes every year and has to be re-read each January.
LouisianacorrectedLouisiana DOR, income tax reform FAQ2026-09-01The 3% flat rate matches. The deduction did not: the department publishes $12,500 single and $25,000 joint for tax years beginning on or after 1 January 2025, and we had $12,875 / $25,750. Our figures carried an inflation adjustment of about 3% that Louisiana does NOT apply — its FAQ gives a fixed amount and never mentions indexing. This is the inverse of the California and Massachusetts pattern: there an update was missing, here we had applied one nobody made. Corrected. Note also that Louisiana's withholding tables use 3.09%, not 3%, and the department explains that in a separate FAQ.
MainependingNot yet checked against the state's own publication.
MarylandcorrectedComptroller of Maryland, 2026 withholding guide and 2025 legislative session tax alert2026-09-01The 2026 standard deduction is $3,400 and we had $3,350 — corrected. The brackets, including the two high-income ones added after 2024, match. Maryland is doubly incomplete in the engine: the local rates of its 23 counties and Baltimore City run from 2.25% to 3.30% and are NOT included, and since 2025 there is a 2% surcharge on net capital gains above $350,000 of federal AGI that we do not model either.
MassachusettscorrectedMass.gov, "Massachusetts 4% Surtax on Taxable Income" and Circular M effective 1 January 20262026-09-01The 5.0% rate matches; the surtax threshold did not. For 2026 it is $1,107,750 and we had $1,083,150, which is 2025's. The Fair Share threshold is indexed to inflation every year, so it expires on its own and has to be re-read each January alongside the federal figures.
MichiganverifiedMichigan Treasury, "State Individual Income Tax Rate for 2026 Tax Year Determined" and withholding guide 446 (Rev. 02-26)2026-09-01The 4.25% rate for 2026 is confirmed by the Treasury. The personal exemption is not: the press release does not carry it, the 2025 guide gave $5,800, and we hold $5,900. Still to be confirmed against the 2026 withholding guide.
MinnesotaverifiedMinnesota DOR, press release of 16 December 2025 on the 2026 brackets2026-09-01The four single brackets (5.35 / 6.80 / 7.85 / 9.85% at $0, $33,310, $109,430 and $203,150) and the standard deduction ($15,300 / $30,600) match exactly. The same release carries the JOINT brackets — $48,700, $193,480, $337,930 — which are not double the single ones. Loaded, making Minnesota the second state to drop the approximation warning. A $5,300 dependent exemption is not yet applied, and Minnesota indexes its brackets annually (2.369% for 2026).
MississippicorrectedMississippi DOR, Pub 89-700 — Withholding Income Tax Tables and Employer Instructions (rev. 01-2026)2026-09-01Same error pattern as Ohio. We held it as a flat 4% from the first dollar; Mississippi does not tax the first $10,000 of taxable income and applies 4% only above that. It overstated by roughly $400 on an $85,000 salary and proportionally more the lower the income. This was the second state where a compiled source had omitted an exempt band, which is what prompted us to go back and audit every remaining "flat" state deliberately. Exemptions confirmed: $6,000 single, $12,000 married, $9,500 head of household; deduction $2,300 / $4,600.
MissouriverifiedMissouri DOR, 2026 Missouri Withholding Tax Formula2026-09-01The 2026 formula confirms the $16,100 / $32,200 standard deduction — Missouri conforms to the federal one — and the 4.7% top rate via supplemental withholding. From 2026 Missouri EXEMPTS CAPITAL GAINS entirely from state tax, the first state to do so; it does not affect the salary calculation but it is the most significant fact about the state. Kansas City and St. Louis still levy their 1% earnings tax, which the engine does not include.
MontanapendingMontana DOR2026-09-01Open. Montana's site does not expose its 2026 brackets in a document our search can return — its publications are addressed by internal identifier rather than by readable URL. The 2026 Form 2 needs locating by hand. The figures we hold (4.70% and 5.65% above $47,500) remain unchecked.
NebraskaverifiedNebraska DOR, Circular EN — withholding effective 1 January 20262026-09-01Top rate of 4.55% confirmed. Nebraska has levelled its third and fourth brackets at that same rate, so the three-bracket structure we serve is the correct one. It adds a $2,050 additional deduction for unmarried filers over 65 or blind, which the engine does not apply.
NevadapendingNot yet checked against the state's own publication.
New HampshirependingNot yet checked against the state's own publication.
New JerseycorrectedNJ Division of Taxation, 2026 Form NJ-1040-ES — Rate Schedules2026-09-01All seven single brackets match; one rate was wrong — the fourth is 5.525%, not 5.53%. The more important find was in the same document: New Jersey's joint and head-of-household table has EIGHT brackets, one more than the single table, including a 2.45% band between $50,000 and $70,000 that a single filer never sees. Now loaded, making New Jersey the first progressive state to drop our joint-bracket approximation warning. It also exempts filers below $10,000 ($20,000 joint) from withholding, a rule the engine does not yet model.
New MexicopendingNew Mexico Taxation and Revenue, Personal Income Tax Rates2026-09-01Open. The rates page exists but does not return its figures to us. The six brackets we hold (1.50% to 5.90%) remain unchecked, and New Mexico reformed its brackets in 2024, which makes it a candidate for being out of date.
New YorkverifiedNYS Dept. of Taxation and Finance, NYS-50-T-NYS (1/26) — Annual Tax Rate Schedule 20262026-09-01The 2026 annual schedule in the state's own withholding publication gives 3.90 / 4.40 / 5.15 / 5.40 / 5.90% at $0, $8,500, $11,700, $13,900 and $80,650, matching what we serve exactly. This entry also retracts an alarm of our own: the state advertises cuts "to 5.50% and 6.00%", figures ABOVE our rates, and we briefly read that as an inconsistency. They are the pre-cut baseline under Chapter 59 of the Laws of 2025 — 5.50 falls to 5.40 in 2026 and 5.30 in 2027. Our figures are the correct 2026 step.
North CarolinaverifiedNCDOR, Tax Rate Schedules2026-09-01The department publishes: "For Taxable Years after 2025, the North Carolina individual income tax rate is 3.99%", matching what we serve. Further cuts may follow from 2027 through automatic revenue-trigger clauses, so this needs revisiting annually.
North DakotapendingNot yet checked against the state's own publication.
OhiocorrectedOhio Revised Code § 5747.02 and the Legislative Service Commission analysis of HB 962026-09-01THE LARGEST ERROR WE FOUND. Ohio does not apply a flat rate from the first dollar: for 2026 it taxes nothing below $27,350 of taxable income and charges 2.75% only above that. Our model charged 2.75% on almost all income — about $2,272 on $85,000 where the correct figure is about $1,585, an overstatement of 43%, and proportionally worse the lower the salary. Corrected to a two-bracket structure, 0% and 2.75%. Ohio completes a two-year transition in 2026: the top rate fell from 3.5% to 3.125% in 2025 before consolidating.
OklahomaverifiedOklahoma Tax Commission, Packet OW-2 (rev. 11-2025) — Table 7, Annual Payroll Period2026-09-01Matches to the cent. The official annual table taxes nothing up to $10,100 and applies 2.50%, 3.50% and 4.50% from $10,100, $11,250 and $13,550. Our thresholds ($3,750 / $4,900 / $7,200) plus the $6,350 standard deduction give exactly those three figures. The married table in the same document, less the $12,700 joint deduction, gives exactly double the single thresholds — confirming that Oklahoma's joint brackets do double, so it drops the approximation warning too. Third state with verified joint treatment, and the first where the answer turned out to be a simple doubling rather than a table of its own.
OregoncorrectedOregon DOR, Oregon Withholding Tax Formulas 150-206-436 (rev. 31 Dec 2025) and Publication OR-ESTIMATE 20262026-09-01All four brackets match. The 2026 exemption credit is $260 and we had $256 — corrected. Oregon is permanently tied to the federal definition of taxable income, so federal changes pass straight through. The Multnomah County and Portland metro local taxes remain outside the engine.
PennsylvaniaverifiedPA Department of Revenue, Personal Income Tax2026-09-01Flat 3.07% confirmed. The department states expressly that Pennsylvania "does not provide for a standard deduction or personal exemption", which is exactly how it is loaded. Pennsylvania does have Tax Forgiveness, a low-income reduction that can wipe out the bill entirely and that the engine does not model.
Rhode IslandpendingNot yet checked against the state's own publication.
South CarolinacorrectedSCDOR, "Information about H. 4216"2026-09-01South Carolina rebuilt its entire income tax for 2026. We held the old three-bracket structure (0%, 3%, 6%); H. 4216, signed 30 March 2026, replaces it with 1.99% below $30,000 and 5.21% above. The formula the department publishes is "5.21% minus $966", which is a calculation on total income rather than a marginal bracket — we checked that it is exactly equivalent to two marginal brackets of 1.99% and 5.21% with the boundary at $30,000, since both give $597 at the cut point, so the function is continuous and the engine reproduces it without changing its logic. Still outstanding and declared: the law decouples South Carolina from the federal standard deduction and creates the South Carolina Income Adjusted Deduction, and we still serve the federal figure. It also caps the state EITC at $200.
South DakotapendingNot yet checked against the state's own publication.
TennesseependingNot yet checked against the state's own publication.
TexaspendingNot yet checked against the state's own publication.
UtahverifiedUtah State Tax Commission, Publication 14 — Withholding Tax Guide2026-09-01The 4.5% rate is confirmed. But we hold it simplified: Utah's Taxpayer Tax Credit is not a fixed $966 — it is 6% of allowable deductions, phasing down with income until it disappears. Our flat credit overstates the relief for high earners and may fall short for low ones. The formula needs modelling, not the average.
VermontincompleteVermont Department of Taxes, GB-1210 — Income Tax Withholding Instructions, Tables and Charts 2026 (annual table)2026-09-01The four RATES (3.35 / 6.60 / 7.60 / 8.75%) are confirmed exactly in the 2026 annual table. The THRESHOLDS are not: the ones we serve are 2025's. The 2026 withholding table puts its cuts at $54,675 / $126,775 / $260,225 on already-reduced wages with a $3,925 exempt band; backing that band out gives roughly $50,750 / $122,850 / $256,300, about 2.7% above what we serve — consistent with one year of indexing. We have NOT loaded those figures: they are our own derivation, not a published number, and putting an inference of ours into the engine is precisely what this process exists to prevent. What is needed is the statutory annual schedule, which is a different document from the withholding table.
VirginiaverifiedVirginia Tax, "New Virginia Tax Laws" and the 2026 Form 760ES2026-09-01Standard deduction of $8,750 / $17,500 and the $930 personal exemption confirmed; all four brackets match. FORWARD WARNING: Virginia's raised standard deduction SUNSETS after tax year 2026 and reverts to $3,000 / $6,000 unless the legislature extends it. It is the sharpest scheduled reversal we have seen in any state. There is also $800 of extra exemption for age or blindness that we do not apply.
WashingtonpendingNot yet checked against the state's own publication.
West VirginiapendingNot yet checked against the state's own publication.
WisconsinverifiedWisconsin DOR, "Tax Rates" and the 2026 Form 1-ES Instructions2026-09-01Structure confirmed: four brackets from 3.50% to 7.65% and a $700 personal exemption. Wisconsin adds $250 of exemption from age 65, which the engine does not apply. Its brackets are indexed to inflation off an August 2024 base year, so they expire each tax year.
WyomingpendingNot yet checked against the state's own publication.

Sources

    An estimate for planning, not tax or payroll advice.

    Related